<p dir="ltr">Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is widely investigated as a non-invasive neuromodulation technique; however, its capacity to modulate cortical excitability within the auditory system remains poorly understood. This study examined whether rTMS applied to auditory cortex regions influences peripheral auditory structures via top-down cortical feedback. Electrophysiological markers of auditory and neural function were assessed in 19 normal-hearing participants before and after stimulation. No significant changes were observed in either peripheral or central auditory responses, suggesting that the rTMS protocol employed here did not produce measurable alterations in auditory cortical excitability, despite being based on current conventions in both research and clinical practice. These findings highlight the need for refined stimulation parameters and standardised guidelines to improve the efficacy and reproducibility of rTMS in auditory neuroscience. </p><p dir="ltr">Data collection took place in 2023 at the Australian Hearing Hub (Level 1 sound-treated and electrically shielded booths), Sydney, Australia. This study primarily focused on physiological responses to sound, with participants undergoing rTMS designed to modulate auditory processing. Ethical approval was granted by the Macquarie University Human Research Ethics Committee (ref: 52023333448210). All participants provided written informed consent and received a small financial reimbursement for their time.</p>
This text has been generated from a tool that has been adapted from the ARDC FAIR Assessment Tool
Findable
--------
Does the dataset have any identifiers assigned?
Global
Is the dataset identifier included in all metadata records/files describing the data?
No
How is the data described with metadata?
Comprehensively (see suggestion) using a recognised formal machine-readable metadata schema
What type of repository or registry is the metadata record in?
Data is in one place but discoverable through several registries
Accessible
----------
How accessible is the data?
Publicly accessible
Is the data available online without requiring specialised protocols or tools once access has been approved?
Standard web service API (e.g. OGC)
Will the metadata record be available even if the data is no longer available?
Yes
Interoperable
-------------
What (file) format(s) is the data available in?
In a structured, open standard, machine-readable format
What best describes the types of vocabularies/ontologies/tagging schemas used to define the data elements?
Standardised vocabularies/ontologies/schema without global identifiers
How is the metadata linked to other data and metadata (to enhance context and clearly indicate relationships)?
There are no links to other metadata
Reusable
--------
Which of the following best describes the license/usage rights attached to the data?
Standard machine-readable license (e.g. Creative Commons)
How much provenance information has been captured to facilitate data reuse?
Fully recorded in a machine-readable format