Macquarie University
Browse

Early childhood educators’ wellbeing - File(s) under embargo

Reason: The consent forms signed by participants did not allow for publicly accessible data. Anyone wanting access to the data should provide the following information: 1. Evidence that the proposed research for which the data will be used has received institutional ethics approval. 2. A brief summary of why the data are needed and how it will be used, e.g., what research question are you addressing and how does this data support you in addressing that question? Requests for access can be sent to the data custodians for the ECEWP project - Rebecca Bull (r.bull@mq.edu.au) or Sandie Wong (sandie.wong@mq.edu.au).

Data and metadata for 'Early childhood educators’ wellbeing and physiological stress in the workplace: An exploratory study utilising wearable technology' - submitted 2024

This item contains files with download restrictions
dataset
posted on 2024-08-14, 05:31 authored by Rebecca BullRebecca Bull, Sandie WongSandie Wong, Tamara CummingTamara Cumming

This study aimed to expand understanding of educator wellbeing by using both subjective and objective measures. The study, with 100 educators in Australia, included subjective measurements of educators’ health and wellbeing using a survey, and objective physiological assessments, including of their stress response, using Hexoskin® wearable technology.

Description of each data variable is provided in the attached metadata file: data description.xlsx

The data is provided in .csv format - in includes 100 participants and 37 variables.

This study was approved by the researchers’ university Human Research Ethics Committee, and was conducted in accordance with the Australian National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (National Health and Medical Research Council, 2018). No information was collected in the study that could identify participants or services. An information statement was provided to all participants before they commenced the study, and participants gave written informed consent. Participants were free to withdraw from the study at any point.

Invitations to participate that explained the purpose and procedure of the study were initially sent to service directors. Directors could agree to participate themselves and/or invite educators in their service to participate. Once an expression of interest was received, the research team made an appointment with the director/educators to meet in person. After completing the informed consent process, participants’ height, weight and waist circumference were measured, and they were fitted for the Hexoskin® biometric shirt. Finally, they completed the online Early Childhood Educators Well-being Survey (ECEWS) (Wong et al, 2023), which included subjective measures of psychological, physical and work-related wellbeing. On their next scheduled working day, participants wore the Hexoskin® shirt for a full shift.

History

Research Project ID

Pure Project ID: 188713622

Q/A Log

  • Institutional review completed
  • FAIR assessment completed

FAIR Self Assessment Summary

Findable Does the dataset have any identifiers assigned? Global Is the dataset identifier included in all metadata records/files describing the data? Yes How is the data described with metadata? Comprehensively (see suggestion) using a recognised formal machine-readable metadata schema What type of repository or registry is the metadata record in? Data is in one place but discoverable through several registries Accessible How accessible is the data? Fully accessible to persons who meet explicitly stated conditions, e.g. ethics approval for sensitive data Is the data available online without requiring specialised protocols or tools once access has been approved? Standard web service API (e.g. OGC) Will the metadata record be available even if the data is no longer available? Yes Interoperable What (file) format(s) is the data available in? In a structured, open standard, machine-readable format What best describes the types of vocabularies/ontologies/tagging schemas used to define the data elements? Standardised vocabularies/ontologies/schema without global identifiers How is the metadata linked to other data and metadata (to enhance context and clearly indicate relationships)? The metadata record includes URI links to related metadata, data and definitions Reusable Which of the following best describes the license/usage rights attached to the data? Standard machine-readable license (e.g. Creative Commons) How much provenance information has been captured to facilitate data reuse? Fully recorded in a machine-readable format

FAIR Self Assessment Rating

  • 5 Stars

Data Sensitivity

  • Sensitive

Usage metrics

    Macquarie University Research Data Repository

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC