File(s) stored somewhere else
Please note: Linked content is NOT stored on Macquarie University and we can't guarantee its availability, quality, security or accept any liability.
Data from: Context-dependent sex allocation: constraints on the expression and evolution of maternal effects
datasetposted on 2022-06-11, 04:17 authored by Sarah R. Pryke, Lee Ann Rollins, Simon C. Griffith
Despite decades of research, whether vertebrates can and do adaptively adjust the sex ratio of their offspring is still highly debated. However, this may have resulted from the failure of empirical tests to identify large and predictable fitness returns to females from strategic adjustment. Here we test the effect of diet quality and maternal condition on facultative sex ratio adjustment in the color polymorphic Gouldian finch (Erythrura gouldiae), a species that exhibits extreme maternal allocation in response to severe and predictable (genetically-determined) fitness costs. On high quality diets, females produced a relatively equal sex ratio, but over-produced sons in poor dietary conditions. Despite the lack of sexual size dimorphism, nutritionally-stressed foster sons were healthier, grew faster, and were more likely to survive than daughters. Although these findings are in line with predictions from sex allocation theory, the extent of adjustment is considerably lower than previously reported for this species. Females therefore have strong facultative control over sex allocation, but the extent of adjustment is likely determined by the relative magnitude of fitness gains and the ability to reliably predict sex-specific benefits from environmental (versus genetic) variables. These findings may help explain the often inconsistent, weak or inconclusive empirical evidence for adaptive sex ratio adjustment in vertebrates.
Usage NotesEvolution 11-0308 Pryke et al complete pdfEvolution 11-0308 Pryke et al.pdfEvolution 11-0308 Pryke et al. 2011a csvEvolution 11-0308 Pryke et al. 2011a.csvEvolution 11-0308 Pryke et al. 2011b csvEvolution 11-0308 Pryke et al. 2011b.csv
FAIR Self Assessment Rating