File(s) stored somewhere else
Please note: Linked content is NOT stored on Macquarie University and we can't guarantee its availability, quality, security or accept any liability.
Data from: Retracted: Experimental evidence that maternal corticosterone controls adaptive offspring sex ratios
datasetposted on 2022-06-10, 03:01 authored by Sarah R. Pryke, Lee A. Rollins, Simon C. Griffith, Buttemer A. William, William A. Buttemer
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN RETRACTED 1. Sex allocation theory has received considerable attention, yet the mechanism(s) by which mothers skew offspring sex ratios remain unknown. In birds, females are the heterogametic sex, which potentially gives them control of whether gametes will be male or female. How females might control the sex of the gamete is unclear, but one possibility is that variation in steroid hormones may mediate this process. 2. We experimentally altered circulating levels of corticosterone in female Gouldian finches (Erythrura gouldiae), a species that demonstrates both extreme stress responses and extreme offspring sex ratio biases when breeding with a low-quality (genetically-incompatible) partner. 3. During egg production, individual females received both corticosterone and metyrapone (a corticosterone-synthesis inhibitor) implants, in random order, to induce both high and low levels of circulating stress hormones (within physiological limits). 4. We found that females with elevated corticosterone levels produced male-biased sex ratios, but when the same females were treated with metyrapone they produced female-biased offspring sex ratios. 5. These stress responses are adaptive because females constrained to breeding with low-quality males can substantially increase their fitness by overproducing sons. Changes in maternal corticosterone levels during stressful situations, such as the quality of a breeding partner, may provide an endocrine mechanism that can be exploited for strategic sex allocation.
Usage NotesPryke et al. FE-2013-00301Following concerns raised by the authors of the above article, a review carried out by Macquarie University revealed that there were inconsistencies between the available dataset and the results reported in the article. The dataset archived with Dryad is incomplete, and it has not been possible to review original data files. Hence, the validity of the results could not be verified, and the article has been retracted.
FAIR Self Assessment Rating