HOPE Pilot Qualitative Interview Raw Data (Feasibility, Appropriateness, Acceptability)
This pain management program was a stakeholder informed intervention adopting the biopsychosocial pain approach for people with hypermobility syndromes experiencing pain. Program feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness here were evaluated qualitatively to understand participants' experiences and perceptions of the program.
One-on-one semi-structured online interviews of participants were undertaken with data analysed using inductive thematic analysis.
The overarching themes from the interviewed confirmed the results of the quantitative study, that is the HOPE program was considered feasible, acceptable and appropriate for people with hypermobility syndromes. Our study findings will be used to refine future iterations of the program, which could be retested through a fully powered trial.
Funding
Nil
History
Research Project ID
MQ Ethics NO. 16301Q/A Log
- Institutional review completed
- FAIR assessment completed
FAIR Self Assessment Summary
This text has been generated from a tool that has been adapted from the ARDC FAIR Assessment Tool Findable -------- Does the dataset have any identifiers assigned? Global Is the dataset identifier included in all metadata records/files describing the data? Yes How is the data described with metadata? Comprehensively (see suggestion) using a recognised formal machine-readable metadata schema What type of repository or registry is the metadata record in? Data is in one place but discoverable through several registries Accessible ---------- How accessible is the data? Publicly accessible Is the data available online without requiring specialised protocols or tools once access has been approved? Standard web service API (e.g. OGC) Will the metadata record be available even if the data is no longer available? Yes Interoperable ------------- What (file) format(s) is the data available in? In a structured, open standard, machine-readable format What best describes the types of vocabularies/ontologies/tagging schemas used to define the data elements? Standardised vocabularies/ontologies/schema without global identifiers How is the metadata linked to other data and metadata (to enhance context and clearly indicate relationships)? The metadata record includes URI links to related metadata, data and definitions Reusable -------- Which of the following best describes the license/usage rights attached to the data? Standard machine-readable license (e.g. Creative Commons) How much provenance information has been captured to facilitate data reuse? Partially recordedFAIR Self Assessment Rating
- 4 Stars
Data Sensitivity
- Sensitive
