01whole.pdf (541.26 kB)
Download file

Belief, agency and negative doxastic control

Download (541.26 kB)
thesis
posted on 29.03.2022, 03:39 authored by Russell Varley
We commonly refer to the actions performed by an individual, which align with their intentions and goals, as expressions of agency. This is due, at least in part, to that individual’s ability to control what they do. It has become near-orthodoxy however to assert an involuntarist position that we have no, or at least very limited, agential control over our beliefs. Two of the most influential defences of the involuntarist account assert that either beliefs are empirically constrained to be more or less passive responses to our available evidence, or that beliefs are conceptually governed only by considerations of what is true. I argue that both of these defences are problematic because what is apparent in their formulation is an overreliance on investigating the control (or lack thereof) that individuals possess in acquiring beliefs. Subsequently, insufficient attention has centred on the control individuals can exhibit over belief removal. Within this context, I defend the two central claims of this thesis, firstly, that the conclusions reached by the prevailing involuntarist arguments do not sufficiently rule out the conceptual viability of doxastic agency. Secondly, that the concept of Negative Doxastic Control - direct control that we can exhibit over the removal of reasonably held beliefs - in conjunction with many of the precepts of the existing literature can widen the lens of our considerations of doxastic agency, showing ultimately that doxastic agency, properly conceived, is indeed conceptually viable.

History

Table of Contents

Chapter 1. Background -- Chapter 2. The empirical defence of involuntarism -- Chapter 3. The conceptual defence of involuntarism -- Chapter 4. Belief, agency and negative doxastic control -- Conclusion -- Bibliography.

Notes

Theoretical thesis. Bibliography: pages 75-78

Awarding Institution

Macquarie University

Degree Type

Thesis MRes

Degree

MRes, Macquarie University, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy

Department, Centre or School

Department of Philosophy

Year of Award

2019

Principal Supervisor

Neil Levy

Rights

Copyright Russell Varley 2018. Copyright disclaimer: http://mq.edu.au/library/copyright

Language

English

Extent

1 online resource (vii, 78 pages)

Former Identifiers

mq:70873 http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/1268571