Macquarie University
Browse

Comparison of active stand and head-up tilt table testing for the diagnosis of orthostatic intolerance syndromes

Download (3.16 MB)
thesis
posted on 2024-03-07, 01:26 authored by Gisele Juliette Bentley

Background: Orthostatic intolerance (OI) causes signs (e.g., elevated heart rate (HR) or reduced blood pressure (BP)) and symptoms (e.g., light-headedness) when standing, which are relieved by lying down. Testing involves measuring HR and BP during a postural challenge (head-up tilt test (HUTT)/active stand (AS)). Variability of testing outcomes is possible due to the lack of testing guidelines and physiological differences between tests. The aim of this thesis was to determine if there is variation between AS and HUTT in the context of OI testing. 

Methods: This thesis used various methods to compare AS to HUTT, including a systematic literature review. We also conducted a controlled pairwise study, accounting for pre- and during-study confounders, with a healthy population (n = 12; 23 ± 7 years; 75% female). Cardiovascular responses were measured using continuous and intermittent monitoring (Finapress, electrocardiogram (ECG), and brachial cuff) during a 40-minute AS and HUTT. After 40-minutes, bilateral leg cuffs occluded the individuals’ lower limbs for 3 minutes, and responses were recorded after release. Additionally, a 5-minute slow HUTT (slower transition from supine to upright) was conducted. 

Results: The 10 papers included in our literature review, revealed high variability between populations, protocols, and results measured. Our controlled experiment revealed inter-test differences in maximum HR (p < 0.05) and minimum BP in AS compared to baseline (p < 0.001). Leg cuff occlusion release showed systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) drops (−8±6mmHg; −6±4mmHG (p < 0.0014)) and elevated HR (14±5bpm (p < 0.05)). No significant difference in the effect of HUTT transition speeds on HR or BP was observed. 

Conclusions: The literature was heterogenous leading to difficulty in comparing HUTT and AS tests. Our controlled experiment demonstrated inter-test variability in maximum HR, while the leg cuff produced HR and BP changes comparable to exogenous protocols, indicating a physiologically meaningful response. Additionally, HUTT transition speeds is not a confounder. OI testing need clear guidelines based on a rigorous comparison of techniques, which should involve both diagnosed and healthy populations. This clarity would enable quicker and more accurate diagnosis of OI. 

History

Table of Contents

1. Introduction -- 2. Comparison of active stand and head-up tilt test: A Systematic Literature Review -- 3. Comparison of active stand (AS) and Head-up Tilt Test (HUTT) under identical conditions and procedures -- 4. Provocations to orthostatic intolerance testing; Bilateral Cuff-Induced Lower Limb Occlusion -- 5. The effect of changes in supine to upright transition time in head-up tilt testing -- 6. Future research -- 7. Conclusions -- Appendices -- Bibliography

Awarding Institution

Macquarie University

Degree Type

Thesis MRes

Degree

Master of Research

Department, Centre or School

Macquarie Medical School

Year of Award

2023

Principal Supervisor

Mark Butlin

Additional Supervisor 1

Karen Peebles

Additional Supervisor 2

Ya Wen Tan

Rights

Copyright: The Author Copyright disclaimer: https://www.mq.edu.au/copyright-disclaimer

Language

English

Extent

166 pages

Former Identifiers

AMIS ID: 279553

Usage metrics

    Macquarie University Theses

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC