Hindu women devotees and menstrual taboos: gender, agency and religion in the case of the Sabarimala temple

<p>Sabarimala temple, located in the south Indian state of Kerala, banned menstruating women from entering its premises from the onset of their menarche until the time they reached menopause. While the majority of Hindu temples across India restrict women’s entry while they are menstruating, the Sabarimala temple prohibits women’s entry during their entire menstruating lifecycle, i.e., between the ages of ten and fifty years. The temple authorities and devotees justify this restriction as part of the diverse Hindu customs and traditional religious beliefs. Liberal media and secular feminists however, argue that the age-old custom of banning women from the temple is a violation of women’s rights and freedom of religious expressions. Many Hindu women devotees insist on supporting the religious injunction despite the lifting of the Sabarimala temple ban by the Indian Supreme Court in 2018. My thesis discusses the response of the Hindu women devotees who uphold the customs of the temple and support the prohibition on the entry of menstruating women. I first discuss the menstrual taboo discourse as a patriarchal construct, as analysed by Western feminist theorists. I argue that the complex notion of religious women’s agency can be understood in a more nuanced manner by being critical of the Western knowledge system, and examining how knowledge is produced and transmitted in its specific cultural context. Located in the intersection between decolonisation theories and feminist theories, my research is grounded on ethnographic interviews and Saba Mahmood’s notion of ‘agency’ to deconstruct the attitude of the Hindu women devotees, especially towards a ritual that prohibits them from expressing their religiosity.</p>