01whole.pdf (1.89 MB)
Download file

Knowns and unknowns: an assessment of knowledge shortfalls in the digitised collection of Australia's flora

Download (1.89 MB)
thesis
posted on 29.03.2022, 01:45 by Md Mohasinul Haque
Massive digitisation of natural history collections (NHC), the predominant source of primary biodiversity data (i.e. species occurrence information), has provided myriad opportunities for studying biological diversity across space and time. Despite recent efforts to collate centuries of biodiversity inventories into comprehensive databases, these collections suffer inherent limitations in their spatial, temporal and taxonomic dimensions. Identifying these limitations is a priority to ensure that multiple targets specified by the Convention on Biological Diversity are met. In this thesis, which consists of four data chapters, I assess spatial, temporal and taxonomic patterns in the digitisation of data held within the Australasian Virtual Herbarium (AVH) - the largest electronic source of plant occurrence records in the country. In Chapter 2, I document spatial biases in the number of occurrence records from across Australia, with the Human Influence Index being a strong predictor of this bias. In Chapter 3, I demonstrate temporal biases, with 80% of records collected from 1970-1999. Furthermore, only 18% of the continent is represented by a relatively complete inventory consistently sampled over the last 200 years. I also found that around 25% of digitised specimens are missing key attribute information (i.e. collection date, taxonomic identification or geographic coordinates). An assessment of taxonomic bias in Chapter 4 indicates that, for one-third of Australia's plant families, the number of preserved specimens per family is not proportional to the family's known species richness. There is also a strong positive correlation between the number of collectors sampling a family and the taxonomic bias of that family. Finally, in Chapter 5, I demonstrate that digitisation effort over the last three decades varies significantly among Australia's herbaria: a time lag in digitisation means that only 30% of specimens are digitised within a year of collection. As the uses of primary biodiversity data continue to expand, my findings can direct future strategic sampling and digitisation efforts to increase our knowledge of Australia's flora.

History

Table of Contents

Chapter One. Introduction -- Chapter Two. How well documented is Australia's flora? Understanding spatial bias in vouchered plant specimens -- Chapter Three. A journey through time : exploring temporal patterns among digitised plant specimens from Australia -- Chapter Four. Taxonomic shortfalls in digitised collections of Australia's flora -- Chapter Five. Filling the gap : how quickly do Australia's herbaria digitise their vouchered specimens -- Chapter Six. Discussion.

Notes

Includes bibliographical references Thesis by publication.

Awarding Institution

Macquarie University

Degree Type

Thesis PhD

Degree

PhD, Macquarie University, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Department of Biological Sciences

Department, Centre or School

Department of Biological Sciences

Year of Award

2018

Principal Supervisor

Linda Jeanne Beaumont

Additional Supervisor 1

David Anthony Nipperess

Rights

Copyright Md. Mohasinul Haque 2018. Copyright disclaimer: http://mq.edu.au/library/copyright

Language

English

Jurisdiction

Australia

Extent

1 online resource (viii, 130 pages) colour maps

Former Identifiers

mq:71062 http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/1270466