Macquarie University
Browse
- No file added yet -

Social policy in COVID-19: understanding fiscal stimulus measures in Australia

Download (806.4 kB)
thesis
posted on 2022-11-04, 01:39 authored by Riley Edwards

The Morrison Coalition government responded to the social and economic consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic with new fiscal stimulus measures. These measures illuminate the new macroeconomic role of the welfare state during crises, as the temporary expansion of social policies – including JobKeeper, JobSeeker, HomeBuilder and the Early Release of Superannuation – formed a key part of the economic response to the crisis. Policy debates around fiscal stimulus have largely focused on Keynesian and neoliberal accounts of macroeconomic management, yet unresolved issues arise when applying these to understanding responses to both the GFC and COVID-19. These issues may stem from structural changes emphasised by the financialisation literature, which highlights the growing importance of households to systemic stability, as the capacity of conventional monetary and fiscal policies to stabilise the economy is reduced. Drawing on this literature, my thesis assesses an alternative account of the macroeconomic role of the welfare state and examines the usefulness of financialisation in understanding social policy responses to the COVID-19 crisis in Australia. In doing so, I aim to map the policy response and develop a preliminary analysis of how it continued, broke with, or transformed neoliberal welfare governance in Australia. Using a three-pronged methodology, combining policy mapping, frame analysis and public data analysis, this thesis seeks to identify the extent to which Keynesian, neoliberal or financialised logics are evident in policy design and implementation, their framing and representation in official discourse and their emerging social and economic impacts. It finds that financialisation offers useful insights into the Australian welfare state’s role in macroeconomic management, where the COVID-19 crisis neither prompted a return of Keynesianism, nor marks the endurance of neoliberalism, however, is consistent with the transformation of the Australian welfare state to a more financialised model.

History

Table of Contents

Chapter 1: Introduction -- Chapter 2: Literature review -- Chapter 3: Conceptual framework and research methodology -- Chapter 4: Policy mapping -- Chapter 5: Policy framing -- Chapter 6: Policy impacts -- Chapter 7: Conclusion -- References -- Appendix: Bibliography of sources consulted in policy framing

Notes

A thesis presented to Macquarie University in partial fulfilment of the requirement of the degree Master of Research (MRes)

Awarding Institution

Macquarie University

Degree Type

Thesis MRes

Degree

Thesis MRes, Macquarie University, Department of Sociology, 2022

Department, Centre or School

Department of Sociology

Year of Award

2022

Principal Supervisor

Adam Stebbing

Additional Supervisor 1

Ben Spies-Butcher

Rights

Copyright: The Author Copyright disclaimer: https://www.mq.edu.au/copyright-disclaimer

Language

English

Jurisdiction

Australia

Extent

91 pages

Usage metrics

    Macquarie University Theses

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC