posted on 2022-03-28, 22:58authored byTony Farshid Sayyadi
In recent years, Humean sentimentalism that grounds moral judgments in sentiments has enjoyed resurgence. One contributing factor may be the works of the prominent philosopher Jesse Prinz, who has notably claimed that emotion is necessary and sufficient for moral judgments. I agree with Prinz that emotions play an essential role in our lives; but I disagree that moral judgments are essentially grounded in emotions. Instead, I claim that moral judgments are grounded in many ways that we interact with our environment such as cognition, perception, intuition, experience, as well as emotion. This thesis explores Prinz's evidence for his claim.
History
Table of Contents
Chapter 1. What is emotion? -- Chapter 2. Is emotion necessary and sufficient for moral judgments? -- Chapter 3. Sentimentalism examined -- Conclusion.
Notes
Bibliography: pages 81-83
Theoretical thesis.
Awarding Institution
Macquarie University
Degree Type
Thesis MRes
Degree
MRes, Macquarie University, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy
Department, Centre or School
Department of Philosophy
Year of Award
2015
Principal Supervisor
Jeanette. Kennett
Rights
Copyright Tony Farshid Sayyadi 2014.
Copyright disclaimer: http://www.copyright.mq.edu.au