posted on 2022-03-28, 17:48authored byMatthew Tuxford
The central argument of this thesis is that economic science requires a methodological reorientation in order to realign with contemporary philosophy of science. This is argued with reference to both the the history of general philosophy of science - in particular the literatures on scientific explanation and the structure of scientific theories - and the history of the methodology of economics. It is also argued that the heterodox school of economic thought, known as complexity economics, offers a valid basis for achieving such a reorientation.
History
Table of Contents
Part 1. Philosophy of science. Chapter 1. Scientific explanation & the structure of scientific theories
Chapter 2. The mechanistic model of scientific explanation & theory structure -- Part 2. Philosophy of economics. Chapter 3. Methodology of economics
Chapter 4. Positivist economics -- Part 3. Complexity economics. Chapter 5. Central themes of complexity economics
Chapter 6. Does complexity economics incorporate a mechanistic methodology? -- Part 4. Case study. Chapter 7. Asset pricing models -- Conclusion -- Endnotes -- Bibliography.
Notes
Theoretical thesis.
Bibliography: pages 448-523
Awarding Institution
Macquarie University
Degree Type
Thesis PhD
Degree
PhD, Macquarie University, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy
Department, Centre or School
Department of Philosophy
Year of Award
2019
Principal Supervisor
Albert Atkin
Additional Supervisor 1
Colin Klein
Additional Supervisor 2
Wylie Bradford
Rights
Copyright Matthew Tuxford 2019.
Copyright disclaimer: http://mq.edu.au/library/copyright